Basic overview of Environmental Conventions
Environmental conventions are international agreements designed to address specific environmental issues. These conventions aim to facilitate cooperation among countries, promote sustainable practices, and provide a framework for addressing environmental challenges.
List of Environmental Conventions | Establishment Year | Adopted in | Came into force in | Description |
Ramsar Convention | 1971 | 1971 | 1975 | Known as the Convention on Wetlands. |
Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage | 1972 | |||
CITES | 1973 | |||
Bonn Convention | 1979 | 1979 | 1983 | Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. |
Nairobi Declaration | 1982 | |||
World Charter of Nature | 1982 | |||
Vienna Convention | 1985 | 1985 | 1988 | Convention for the Protection of Ozone Layer |
Montreal Protocol | 1987 | 1987 | 1989 | International protocol on substances that deplete the Ozone Layer. |
Helsinki Declaration | 1989 | |||
Basel Convention | 1989 | 1989 | 1992 | Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. |
Convention on Biological Diversity | 1992 | 1992 | 1993 | Convention for the conservation of biological diversity. |
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) | 1992 | 1992 | 1994 | Treaty to combat climate change through adaptation and mitigation efforts |
Rio Summit | 1992 | – | – | United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. |
UN Convention on Desertification | 1994 | 1994 | 1996 | United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. |
Kyoto Protocol | 1997 | 1997 | 2005 | International protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
Rotterdam Convention | 1998 | 1998 | 2004 | International Environmental Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC) Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. |
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety | 2000 | 2000 | 2003 | International protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. |
Stockholm Convention | 2001 | 2001 | 2004 | Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). |
UN-REDD | 2008 | – | – | United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. |
Nagoya Protocol | 2010 | 2010 | 2014 | International Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). |
Minamata Convention | 2013 | |||
COP21-Paris agreement | 2016 | |||
Kigali Amendment | 2016 | 2016 | 2019 | Amendment to the Montreal Protocol. |
COP24-Katowice | 2018 | |||
COP25- Madrid,Spain | 2019 | |||
COP26-Glasgow,U.K. | 2021 | |||
COP27-Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt | 2022 | |||
COP28-Dubai,UAE | 2023 | |||
COP29-Baku,Azerbaijan | 2024 | |||
COP30-Belém,Brazil | 2025 |
1.Ramsar Convention, 1971
Introduction:
- The Ramsar Convention, formally known as the Convention on Wetlands, serves as an intergovernmental treaty outlining the framework for national and international efforts toward the conservation and sustainable use of wetlands and their resources.
Adoption and Enforcement:
- Adopted in 1971 in Ramsar, Iran, the convention came into force in 1975, following the receipt of accession instruments by UNESCO, the depositary of the Convention.
- The RAMSAR Secretariat is situated at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. World Wetlands Day is commemorated on February 2nd annually.
Criteria for Selecting a Ramsar Site:
- Representative Wetland Type:
- Recognition if the site is a representative, rare, or unique example of a natural or near-natural wetland type within the suitable biogeographic region.
- Support for Vulnerable Species:
- Evaluation based on the support for vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered species or threatened ecological communities.
- Biological Diversity Maintenance:
- Assessment of the site’s support for populations of plant and/or animal species crucial for maintaining the biological diversity of a specific biogeographic region.
- Critical Life Cycle Stage:
- Consideration if the site supports plant and/or animal species at a critical stage in their life cycles or provides refuge during adverse conditions.
- Water-Bird Population:
- Recognition if the site regularly supports 20,000 or more water-birds.
- 1% Water-Bird Population:
- Evaluation if the site regularly supports 1% of the individuals in a population of one species or subspecies of water-bird.
- Indigenous Fish Population:
- Assessment based on the support for a significant proportion of indigenous fish subspecies, species, or families that contribute to global biological diversity.
- Fishery Importance:
- Recognition if the site is an important source of food for fishes, serving as a spawning ground, nursery, and/or migration path vital for fish stocks.
- 1% Non-Avian Wetland Species:
- Evaluation if the site regularly supports 1% of the individuals in a population of one species or subspecies of wetland-dependent non-avian animal species.
The Montreux Record:
- The Montreux Record functions as a register of wetland sites within the List of Wetlands of International Importance, documenting changes in ecological character due to technological developments, pollution, or other human interference. This record is maintained as part of the Ramsar List.
Ramsar Sites in India:
Objective: The Ramsar list aims “to develop and maintain an international network of wetlands important for the conservation of global biological diversity and for sustaining human life through the maintenance of their ecosystem components, processes, and benefits.”
Enforcement in India: The convention came into effect in India on February 1, 1982. India hosts 75(in 2023) Ramsar sites. Keoladeo National Park and Loktak Lake are designated in the Montreux Record, while Chilka Lake was initially designated but removed in 2002.
List of Ramsar Sites in India
1 | Kolleru Lake | Andhra Pradesh | 2002 |
2 | Deepor Beel | Assam | 2002 |
3 | Kanwar (Kabar) Taal | Bihar | 2020 |
4 | Nanda Lake | Goa | 2022 |
5 | Khijadia WLS | Gujarat | 2021 |
6 | Nalsarovar BS | Gujarat | 2012 |
7 | Thol Lake | Gujarat | 2021 |
8 | Wadhvana Wetland | Gujarat | 2021 |
9 | Bhindawas WLS | Haryana | 2021 |
10 | Sultanpur NP | Haryana | 2021 |
11 | Chandra Taal | Himachal Pradesh | 2005 |
12 | Pong Dam Lake | Himachal Pradesh | 2002 |
13 | Renuka Lake | Himachal Pradesh | 2005 |
14 | Ranganathituu BS | Karnataka | 2022 |
15 | Ashtamudi Wetland | Kerala | 2002 |
16 | Sasthamkotta Lake | Kerala | 2002 |
17 | Vembanad-Kol Wetland (Longest Lake in India) | Kerala | 1905 |
18 | Bhoj Wetland | Madhya Pradesh | 2002 |
19 | Sakhya Sagar | Madhya Pradesh | 2022 |
20 | Sirpur wetland | Madhya Pradesh | 2022 |
21 | Yashwant Sagar | Madhya Pradesh | 2022 |
22 | Lonar Lake (Impact Crater Lake) | Maharashtra | 2020 |
23 | Nandur Madhameshwar | Maharashtra | 2019 |
24 | Thane Creek | Maharashtra | 2022 |
25 | Loktak Lake | Manipur | 1990 |
26 | Pala Wetland | Mizoram | 2021 |
27 | Ansupa Lake | Odisha | 2021 |
28 | Bhitarkanika Mangroves | Odisha | 2002 |
29 | Chilika Lake (Oldest Ramsar Site in India) | Odisha | 1981 |
30 | Hirakud Reservoir | Odisha | 2021 |
31 | Satkosia Gorge | Odisha | 2021 |
32 | Tampara Lake | Odisha | 2021 |
33 | Beas CnR | Punjab | 2019 |
34 | Harike Wetland | Punjab | 1990 |
35 | Kanjli Wetland | Punjab | 2002 |
36 | Keshopur-Miani CmR | Punjab | 2019 |
37 | Nangal WLS | Punjab | 2019 |
38 | Ropar Wetland | Punjab | 2002 |
39 | Keoladeo National Park | Rajasthan | 1981 |
40 | Sambhar Lake | Rajasthan | 1990 |
41 | Chitrangudi BS | Tamil Nadu | 2021 |
42 | Gulf of Mannar Marine BR | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
43 | Kanjirankulam BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
44 | Karikili BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
45 | Koonthankulam BS | Tamil Nadu | 2021 |
46 | Pallikaranai Marsh Reserve Forest | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
47 | Pichavaram Mangrove | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
48 | Point Calimere WLS & BS | Tamil Nadu | 2002 |
49 | Suchindram Theroor Wetland Complex | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
50 | Udhayamarthandapuram BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
51 | Vaduvur BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
52 | Vedanthangal BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
53 | Vellode BS | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
54 | Vembannur Wetland Complex | Tamil Nadu | 2022 |
55 | Rudrasagar Lake | Tripura | 2005 |
56 | Hokera Wetland | UT of JK | 2005 |
57 | Hygam Wetland CnR | UT of JK | 2022 |
58 | Shallbugh Wetland CnR | UT of JK | 2022 |
59 | Surinsar-Mansar Lakes | UT of JK | 2005 |
60 | Wular Lake | UT of JK | 1990 |
61 | Tso Kar (High Altitude Ramsar Site) | UT of Ladakh | 2020 |
62 | Tsomoriri (High Altitude Ramsar Site) | UT of Ladakh | 2002 |
63 | Bakhira WLS | Uttar Pradesh | 2021 |
64 | Haiderpur Wetland | Uttar Pradesh | 2021 |
65 | Nawabganj BS | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
66 | Parvati Arga BS | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
67 | Saman BS | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
68 | Samaspur BS | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
69 | Sandi BS | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
70 | Sarsai Nawar Jheel | Uttar Pradesh | 2019 |
71 | Sur Sarovar (Keetham Lake) | Uttar Pradesh | 2020 |
72 | Upper Ganga River (Brijghat to Narora) | Uttar Pradesh | 2005 |
73 | Asan Barrage | Uttarakhand | 2020 |
74 | East Kolkata Wetlands | West Bengal | 2002 |
75 | Sundarban Wetland (Largest Ramsar Site in India) | West Bengal | 2019 |
State wise List of Ramsar Sites in India:
State/UT | No. of sites | Names of sites |
Andhra Pradesh | 1 | Kolleru Lake |
Assam | 1 | Deepor Beel |
Bihar | 1 | Kanwar Lake |
Goa | 1 | Nanda Lake |
Gujarat | 4 | Khijadiya, Nalsarovar, Thol Lake, Wadhvana Wetland |
Haryana | 2 | Sultanpur National Park, Bhindawas Wildlife Sanctuary |
Himachal Pradesh | 3 | Chandra Taal, Pong Dam Lake, Renuka Lake |
Jammu and Kashmir | 5 | Hokersar Wetland, Hygam Wetland Conservation Reserve, Shallbugh Wetland Conservation Reserve, Surinsar–Mansar Lakes,Wular Lake, |
Karnataka | 1 | Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary |
Kerala | 3 | Ashtamudi Wetland, Sasthamkotta Lake, Vembanad-Kol Wetland |
Ladakh | 2 | Tso Kar, Tsomoriri Lake |
Madhya Pradesh | 4 | Bhoj Wetland, Sakhya Sagar, Sirpur Lake, Yashwant Sagar |
Maharashtra | 3 | Lonar Lake, Nandur Madhameshwar, Thane Creek |
Manipur | 1 | Loktak Lake |
Mizoram | 1 | Pala Wetland |
Odisha | 6 | Ansupa Lake, Bhitarkanika Mangroves, Chilika Lake, Hirakud Reservoir, Satkosia Gorge, Tampara Lake |
Punjab | 6 | Beas Conservation Reserve, Harike Wetland, Kanjli Wetland, Keshopur-Miani Community Reserve, Nangal Wildlife Sanctuary, Ropar Wetland |
Rajasthan | 2 | Keoladeo National Park, Sambhar Lake |
Tamil Nadu | 14 | Chitrangudi Bird Sanctuary, Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve, Kanjirankulam Bird Sanctuary, Karikili Bird Sanctuary, Koonthankulam Bird Sanctuary, Pallikarnai Marsh Reserve Forest, Pichavaram Mangrove, Point Calimere Wildlife and Bird Sanctuary, Suchindram Theroor Wetland Complex, Udhayamarthandapuram Bird Sanctuary, Vadavur Bird Sanctuary, Vedanthangal Bird Sanctuary, Vellode Bird Sanctuary, Vembannur Wetland Complex |
Tripura | 1 | Rudrasagar Lake |
Uttar Pradesh | 10 | Bakhira Sanctuary, Haiderpur Wetland, Nawabganj Bird Sanctuary, Parvati Arga Bird Sanctuary, Saman Bird Sanctuary, Samaspur Bird Sanctuary, Sandi Bird Sanctuary, Sarsai Nawar Jheel, Sur Sarovar, Upper Ganga River |
Uttarakhand | 1 | Asan Barrage |
West Bengal | 2 | East Kolkata Wetlands, Sundarban Wetland |
2.The World Heritage Convention (1972):
Preservation of Nature and Culture
- The Convention, initiated in 1972, acknowledges the intricate relationship between human interaction and nature, emphasizing the critical necessity to maintain equilibrium between the two.
Criteria for World Heritage Inscription:
- The Convention delineates the specific characteristics of natural or cultural sites eligible for inscription on the World Heritage List under UNESCO.
Role of the World Heritage Centre (Established in 1992):
- Founded in 1992, the World Heritage Centre takes on the responsibility of daily management, ensuring effective implementation of the Convention.
Integrated Approach:
- A distinctive feature of the 1972 World Heritage Convention is its consolidation of nature conservation and cultural property preservation in a unified document. It underscores the interconnectedness of human activities with nature and the essential imperative to sustain a harmonious balance.
World Heritage Sites in India:
- Currently, India boasts 40 World Heritage Sites, comprising 32 cultural, 7 natural, and 1 mixed site (fulfilling both cultural and natural criteria). These designations are determined by UNESCO’s selection criteria. Remarkably, India holds the sixth-largest number of World Heritage Sites globally.
Natural World Heritage Site | State | Year of Notification |
---|---|---|
Kaziranga National Park | Assam | 1985 |
Keoladeo Ghana National Park | Rajasthan | 1985 |
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary | Assam | 1985 |
Nanda Devi National Park and Valley of Flowers | Uttarakhand | 1988 |
Sundarbans National Park | West Bengal | 1987 |
Western Ghats | Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and, Kerala | 2012 |
Great Himalayan National Park | Himachal Pradesh | 2014 |
3.Bonn Convention (CMS):
Introduction:
- The Bonn Convention, officially known as the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), operates as an intergovernmental treaty under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
- Established in 1979, the convention came into force in 1983 and, as of March 1, 2022, boasts 133 Parties. India has been an active participant in the CMS since 1983.
Objectives:
- The primary objective of the CMS is to conserve terrestrial, marine, and avian migratory species across their entire range.
- Serving as a legal framework, it facilitates the implementation of global-scale conservation measures.
- The legal instruments employed under the CMS range from binding Agreements to more informal Memoranda of Understanding (MoU).
Appendices under CMS: The CMS categorizes species into two distinct appendices:
- Appendix I: Enlists ‘Threatened Migratory Species.’
- Appendix II: Lists ‘Migratory Species requiring international cooperation.’
India’s Engagement with CMS:
- India, recognizing the significance of migratory species conservation, has collaborated with the CMS through non-legally binding Memoranda of Understanding (MoU).
- These agreements focus on the conservation and management of specific species, including Siberian Cranes (1998), Marine Turtles (2007), Dugongs (2008), and Raptors (2016).
Biodiversity Contribution:
- Despite covering only 2.4% of the world’s land area, India plays a vital role in global biodiversity, contributing around 8% to the known biodiversity.
- The country provides temporary refuge to various migratory species such as Amur Falcons, Bar-headed Geese, Black-necked Cranes, Marine Turtles, Dugongs, Humpback Whales, and more.
- This collaborative effort underscores India’s commitment to the conservation goals outlined by the CMS.
4.Nairobi Declaration
Background:
- Adopted in 1982, marking the 10th anniversary of the Stockholm Conference.
Objectives:
- Envisioned the establishment of a dedicated commission to develop comprehensive, long-term environmental strategies for achieving sustainable development beyond the year 2000.
Endorsement:
-
- Officially endorsed by the governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in 1987.
5.The “World Charter for Nature” (1982):
In a significant development on October 28, 1982, the United Nations introduced the “World Charter for Nature,” providing a framework for the safeguarding and maintenance of worldwide natural habitats and resources. This charter delineated five essential “principles of conservation,” serving as guidelines for all human actions impacting nature. Additionally, it underscored the imperative consideration of natural systems in tandem with social and economic development.
Key Elements of the World Charter for Nature:
- Principles of Conservation:
- The charter defined five core principles of conservation, establishing a comprehensive code of conduct for human interactions with nature.
- Guiding Human Conduct:
- Emphasizing the charter’s significance, it serves as a benchmark to guide and evaluate all human conduct that influences the environment.
- Integration of Natural Systems:
- The charter recognizes the inseparable link between social and economic development and the necessity to integrate natural systems into the decision-making process.
6.Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer:
Background:
- Ratified in 1985, effective from 1988, the Vienna Convention sets the framework for global efforts to safeguard the ozone layer.
- While lacking legally binding CFC use reduction targets, it paved the way for the Montreal Protocol.
Origins and Global Concern:
- Developed in response to studies in the 1970s revealing man-made chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) impact on ozone molecules.
Salient Features:
- The first of its kind, universally adopted in 2009.
- The Montreal Protocol, implemented in 1987, supports the Convention’s goals by reducing Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs) production and use.
- Designated Ozone Day on September 16, 1994, when both the Montreal Protocol and Vienna Convention were universally adopted.
Vienna Convention – Purpose and Goals:
Primary Objective:
- Established on March 22, 1985, the primary goal is to prevent the destruction of the ozone layer.
- Ratified by all member states on September 16, 2009, making it the first treaties in United Nations history.
Conference of Parties (COP):
- Conducted every three years
Ozone Depletion and Vienna Convention:
Scientific Insights:
- Ozone layer thinning is evident, influenced by man-made substances like industrial gases.
- Natural occurrences, such as volcanic eruptions, contribute to ozone level changes, but current depletion is primarily human-induced.
Industrial Impact:
- Industrial gases used in products like aerosol sprays, freezers, and air conditioners break down into halogen atoms, depleting ozone through catalytic cycles.
- Antarctica exhibits the highest ozone depletion due to unique atmospheric conditions during winter.
Vienna Convention – International Impact and India’s Involvement:
Global Reach:
- Vienna Convention impacts global policies, as demonstrated by the Kigali Agreement, seeking to reduce hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) by 80-85% by 2045.
India’s Role:
- India, a signatory since inception, ratified the treaty in 1991 and acceded to the Montreal Protocol in 1992.
- The Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change oversees the Montreal Protocol’s implementation in India, with the Ozone Cell ensuring compliance.
- India successfully phased out carbon tetrachloride (CTC) by January 1, 2010, in alignment with protocol requirements.
6(A).The Montreal Protocol
Establishment and Objectives:
- In 1987, the international community established the Montreal Protocol as a response to the depletion of the ozone layer.
- This groundbreaking treaty, signed by all nations, is celebrated as a significant environmental triumph within the United Nations.
Primary Objective:
- The Montreal Protocol aims to curb the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances, thereby mitigating their impact on the Earth’s ozone layer.
Original Protocol (1987):
- Developed countries, under the original agreement, were mandated to initiate the phasing out of CFCs in 1993.
- Targets included a 20% reduction relative to 1986 consumption levels by 1994 and a subsequent 50% reduction by 1998.
- Additionally, developed nations were required to freeze production and consumption of halons at 1986 levels.
Protocol Amendments:
- The Parties to the Montreal Protocol have amended the agreement to address new chemicals and establish a financial mechanism facilitating compliance for developing countries.
Equitable Treatment and Acknowledgment:
- Notably, the Montreal Protocol acknowledged that nations should not be treated uniformly.
- Recognizing varying contributions to ozone depletion, the agreement established more stringent standards and an accelerated phase-out timetable for countries that have contributed most significantly.
Global Acceptance:
- India, recognizing the significance of this protocol, accepted it along with its London Amendment in September 1992.
Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol:
Background and Adoption:
- On October 15, 2016, under the leadership of the United States, 197 nations came together in Kigali, Rwanda, to adopt an amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
- The amendment specifically targets the phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are widely used in air conditioning, refrigeration, and foam insulation.
Objectives of the Kigali Amendment:
- Aims to achieve a substantial reduction of HFC production and consumption.
- Seeks to accomplish an ambitious goal of over 80% reduction in HFC consumption by the year 2047.
- Recognizes the powerful greenhouse gas nature of HFCs, despite their lack of impact on ozone layer depletion.
Legal Framework and Implementation:
- The Kigali Amendment is legally binding and officially took effect on January 1, 2019.
- Developed countries initiated the reduction of HFC consumption in 2019.
- Most developing countries are set to freeze consumption in 2024, while specific circumstances allow for a delayed freeze until 2028 for certain developing countries, including India.
Phased Reduction Targets:
- Developed countries are mandated to reduce HFC use by 10% from 2011-2013 levels by 2019 and by 85% by 2036.
- A second group of developing countries, such as China and African nations, commit to commencing the transition in 2024. They aim for a 10% reduction compared to 2020-2022 levels by 2029 and 80% by 2045.
- A third group of developing countries, including India, Pakistan, and Arab Gulf states, begin their reduction process in 2028. Their targets include a 10% reduction by 2032 from 2024-2026 levels and an ultimate 85% reduction by 2047.
Financial Support for Transition:
- The amendment includes provisions for financing to aid certain countries in transitioning to climate-friendly alternatives.
- This financial support acknowledges the unique circumstances of developing nations and facilitates their move away from HFC reliance.
7.Basel Convention on Trans-Boundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes (1989):
Introduction:
- In response to the increasing public resistance and rising disposal costs related to hazardous wastes in the industrialized world during the 1980s, the Basel Convention on Trans-Boundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes was established.
- This period witnessed a phenomenon known as the NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard) syndrome, prompting some operators to seek inexpensive disposal options in developing countries with less developed environmental awareness and lacking regulatory enforcement.
Key Provisions:
- The Basel Convention, implemented as an international treaty, aims to curtail the movement of hazardous waste across nations.
- Its primary focus is to prevent the transfer of hazardous waste from developed countries to less developed countries (LDCs).
- It is important to note that the convention does not address the movement of radioactive waste. The treaty officially came into force in 1992.
Objectives: The overarching objectives of the Basel Convention are threefold:
- Reduce Trans-Boundary Movements: The convention seeks to decrease the trans-boundary movements of hazardous wastes.
- Minimize Waste Creation: It aims to minimize the creation of hazardous wastes.
- Prohibit Shipment to LDCs: One of its crucial goals is to prohibit the shipment of hazardous waste from developed countries to less developed countries.
Implementation in India:
- India, recognizing the significance of addressing hazardous waste management, ratified the Basel Convention. Subsequently, the country enacted the Hazardous Wastes Management Rules Act in 1989.
- This legislation incorporates essential Basel provisions related to the notification of import and export of hazardous wastes, illegal traffic, and liability.
- The move demonstrates India’s commitment to aligning its waste management practices with international standards outlined by the Basel Convention.
8.United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit), 1992
- In continuation of the Stockholm Declaration, 1972 and the Nairobi Declaration,1982 the third major Declaration was held in Rio-de-Janeiro in Brazil in the year 1992.
- Hence it is termed as Rio-Declaration and attended by over 150 countries. Hence, it is also well known as ―Earth Summit.
- It discussed global and environmental problems very widely.
- It was the biggest International Conference in the history of International Relations – was also called the “Parliament of the planet”
The formal process of UNCED culminated in the adoption of five documents, namely
- Rio Declaration– a statement of broad principles to guide national
conduct on environmental protection and development. - Agenda-21, a massive document containing a detailed action-plan for sustainable development.
- Principles of Forestry.
- Convention on Climate Change and
- Convention onBiodiversity.
The Rio Declaration
- The Rio Declaration was adopted in the conference recognizing the universal and integral nature of Earth and by establishing a global partnership among states and enlisting general rights and obligations on environmental protection.
- The RioDeclaration is a statement of 27 principles for the guidance of national environmental behaviour and enlisting general rights and obligations on environmental protection.
- Rio principles placed human beings at the centre of sustainable development concerns by stating that humans are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature
- The gist of those principles are happy and healthy life to all people in the world in order to achieve this goal, concept of sustainable development has been established.
- To achieve sustainable development, states shall reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption, exchange of scientific and technological knowledge, compensation for adverse effects of environmental damage caused by activities with in their jurisdiction or control to areas beyond their jurisdiction, precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states polluter should bear the cost of pollution, Environmental impact assessment as an instrument to monitor the likely environmental effects.
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY (GEF):
Establishment and Location:
- GEF was founded on the eve of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to address global environmental challenges.
- Headquarters located in Washington D.C., United States.
- Participation involves 184 parties.
Joint Management:
- GEF is jointly managed by three organizations: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), World Bank, and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Grant Allocation:
- As an independent financial institution, GEF allocates grants for projects covering a spectrum of environmental issues.
- Supported project categories include Biodiversity, Climate Change, International Waters, Land Degradation, Ozone Layer, Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), Mercury, Sustainable Forest Management, Food Security, and Sustainable Cities.
Financial Mechanism for Conventions:
- GEF serves as the financial mechanism for various international conventions, namely:
- Stockholm Convention
- UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN-FCC)
- UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UN-CBD)
- UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UN-CCD)
- Montreal Protocol
- Minamata Convention
Agenda-21
- Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.
- It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.
- It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels.
- One major objective of the Agenda 21 initiative is that every local government should draw its own local Agenda 21.
- Its aim initially was to achieve global sustainable development by 2000, with the “21” in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.
- It is a comprehensive action plan which gives a future plan in relation to
environment and development. - The Agenda emphasizes on issues like poverty, health consumption patterns, natural resource use, financial resources human settlements and technological
- It also includes energy, climate and other wide range of issues concerning
environment and development. - Agenda-21 is not a binding document but it constitutes the key document of the Rio
Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD):
Established and Secretariat Location:
- Established in 1994.
- The Secretariat is located in Bonn, Germany, since January 1999.
International Linkage and Sustainable Land Management:
- The UNCCD is the only legally binding international agreement that connects environment and development to sustainable land management.
- It stands out as the sole convention resulting directly from a recommendation of the Rio Conference’s Agenda 21.
Awareness and Recognition:
- In 2006, the Convention gained global recognition as the “International Year of Deserts and Desertification,” emphasizing the importance of combating desertification.
- The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change is the designated nodal Ministry responsible for overseeing this Convention.
Implementation Strategies:
- The Convention outlines strategies and action plans for member countries to implement sustainable land management practices.
Research and Innovation:
- UNCCD supports research and innovation to develop effective solutions for combating desertification, including technologies for sustainable agriculture and land restoration.
Monitoring and Reporting:
- The Convention establishes mechanisms for monitoring land degradation and reporting on progress, ensuring accountability among member nations.
9.Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD):
Background and Legal Status:
- Became a legally binding treaty on December 29, 1993.
- Currently has 196 parties and 168 signatories, including India.
- Almost all nations have ratified the CBD, with the notable exception of the United States, which has signed but not ratified it.
CBD Secretariat and Operations:
- The CBD Secretariat is based in Montreal, Canada.
- Operates under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Key Protocols:
- Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
- Adopted during COP 5 on January 29, 2000.
- Came into force on September 11, 2003.
- Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS):
- Adopted on October 29, 2010, in Nagoya, Japan, at COP10.
- Entered into force on October 12, 2014.
Strategic Plan and Targets:
- COP-10 adopted the ten-year framework known as the “Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.”
- This plan includes 20 ambitious yet achievable targets collectively known as the Aichi Targets for biodiversity.
National Implementation:
- India enacted the Biological Diversity Act in 2002 to give effect to the provisions of the CBD.
Global Perspective:
- The CBD focuses on three main goals:
- Conservation of biological diversity.
- Sustainable use of the components of biological diversity.
- Fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources.
International Participation:
- Apart from the United States, all UN member states are parties to the CBD.
9(A).Nagoya Protocol:
The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS) stands as a supplementary agreement to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
- Adopted in 2010 in Nagoya, Japan.
- Entered into force in October 2014.
Objectives of the Protocol:
The primary objective of the Nagoya Protocol is to ensure the fair and equitable sharing of benefits derived from the utilization of genetic resources, contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
- Establishes a legal framework to implement the Convention on Biological Diversity’s goal of fair and equitable benefit-sharing.
- Imposes obligations on members to enact measures related to access to genetic resources, benefit-sharing, and compliance.
Significance of the Nagoya Protocol:
The Nagoya Protocol holds substantial importance in the realm of biodiversity conservation and the fair distribution of benefits linked to genetic resources, aiming to prevent the exploitation of indigenous peoples and their traditional knowledge.
- Promotes legal certainty and transparency for both users and owners of genetic resources.
- Sets predictable conditions for access to genetic resources.
- Enhances benefit-sharing experiences when genetic resources move across borders.
- Contributes to better conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources, consequently supporting biodiversity conservation.
- Represents a crucial step in the implementation of the CBD.
Role in Biodiversity Conservation:
The Nagoya Protocol plays a vital role in the conservation of biodiversity by addressing the specific needs of genetic resources from animals, plants, and microorganisms.
- Genetic resources are increasingly valuable in various fields such as drug development, crop protection, specialized chemicals production, and industrial processing.
- Provides researchers with a framework to access genetic resources for biotechnology research, ensuring a fair share in benefits.
- Respects the value of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, benefiting indigenous and local communities through a legal framework.
9(B).Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is a supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and was adopted on January 29, 2000, in Cartagena, Colombia. This protocol specifically addresses the safe handling, transfer, and use of living modified organisms (LMOs), also known as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), that may have adverse effects on biodiversity.
Key Objectives:
- Regulating Transboundary Movements: The primary aim of the Cartagena Protocol is to regulate transboundary movements of LMOs to ensure their safe transfer and prevent potential risks to biological diversity.
- Advance Informed Agreement (AIA): The protocol introduces the concept of Advance Informed Agreement, requiring exporting countries to notify and obtain consent from importing countries before transferring LMOs.
- Risk Assessment and Management: It establishes a clear framework for the risk assessment and management of living modified organisms, incorporating scientific principles to evaluate potential adverse effects on biodiversity.
Core Provisions:
- Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH): The Cartagena Protocol establishes a Biosafety Clearing-House, a mechanism designed to facilitate the exchange of information on living modified organisms, their potential risks, and risk management measures.
- Identification, Documentation, and Labeling: The protocol emphasizes the importance of proper identification, documentation, and labeling of LMOs to enhance transparency and enable better monitoring of their movements.
- Capacity Building and Public Awareness: Recognizing the need for global cooperation, the protocol encourages capacity-building initiatives and promotes public awareness regarding the safe transfer and use of living modified organisms.
Implementation and Compliance:
The Cartagena Protocol operates on a system of mutual cooperation and respect for national sovereignty. It calls for countries to develop their domestic regulations to align with the protocol’s objectives and encourages the sharing of information and experiences among nations.
10.United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC):
- An international environmental treaty addressing climate change.
- Negotiated and signed at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992.
- Headquarters located in Bonn, Germany; entered into force on March 21, 1994, with 197 parties.
Key Features and Classification:
- Objective:
- Aims to stabilize Greenhouse Gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
- Legally Non-Binding:
- The convention itself is not legally binding.
- Parties:
- Involves 197 countries.
- Parties classified into different groups.
- Annex I Parties:
- 43 countries, including the European Union.
- Classified as industrialized (developed) countries and “economies in transition” (EITs).
- 14 EITs are the former centrally-planned (Soviet) economies of Russia and Eastern Europe.
- Annex II Parties:
- 24 Parties, including the European Union.
- Made up of members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
- Required to provide financial and technical support to EITs and developing countries for climate change mitigation and adaptation.
- Annex B Parties:
- Parties listed in Annex B of the Kyoto Protocol with first- or second-round Kyoto greenhouse gas emissions targets.
- Amendments related to second-round targets from 2013–2020 have not entered into force.
- Least-Developed Countries (LDCs):
- 49 Parties are LDCs, granted special status under the treaty due to their limited capacity to adapt to climate change effects.
- Non-Annex I Parties:
- Parties not listed in Annex I are mostly low-income developing countries.
- Developing countries may volunteer to become Annex I countries when sufficiently developed.
Additional Information:
- Originally sets no binding limits on GHG emissions for individual countries and contains no enforcement provisions.
- The Kyoto Protocol (1997) was negotiated under this framework.
- Conference of the Parties (COP) is the supreme governing body of the UNFCCC.
- Climate Technology Centre Network serves as the operational arm, promoting the transfer of technology for low-carbon and carbon-resilient development.
Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR):
Historical Context:
- Formalized during the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) at the0 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
- UNFCCC represents the first international legal instrument aimed at addressing climate change comprehensively.
Principle Overview:
- The CBDR principle is a core component of the UNFCCC.
- It recognizes that all states share an obligation to address environmental destruction.
- However, it underscores the unequal responsibility of states concerning environmental protection.
Basis and Rationale:
- CBDR is grounded in the relationship between industrialization and climate change.
- It posits that more industrialized countries are more likely to have contributed significantly to climate change.
Key Characteristics:
- CBDR acknowledges the need for a differentiated approach, considering the varying levels of industrial development among states.
- It highlights the historical context of environmental impacts, emphasizing the responsibility of more industrialized nations.
Application and Implications:
- The principle guides international efforts to address climate change by recognizing the need for differentiated responsibilities based on historical contributions to environmental degradation.
- It forms the basis for negotiations and agreements that seek to balance the global commitment to environmental protection with the recognition of historical disparities in industrial development.
Kyoto Protocol Overview:
- Adopted in Kyoto, Japan, during the CoP3 of UNFCCC in 1997.
- Came into force by February 2005.
Parties and Non-Parties:
- Involves 192 parties; notable non-parties include Andorra, Canada, South Sudan, and the United States.
- India ratified the protocol in 2002.
Emission Reduction Goals:
- Aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the developed world by approximately 5% by 2012 compared to 1990 levels, focusing on the first commitment period from 2008 to 2012.
Covered Greenhouse Gases:
- Applies to six GHGs listed in Annex A:
- Carbon dioxide (CO2)
- Methane (CH4)
- Nitrous oxide (N2O)
- Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
- Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
- Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6).
Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities:
- Built on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.
Classification of Parties:
- Annex-I countries:
- Includes industrialized countries and economies in transition.
- Enforced with compulsory binding targets to reduce GHG emissions.
- Annex II:
- A sub-group of Annex I.
- Mandated to provide financial assistance and technology to Non-Annex countries.
- Non-Annex:
- Comprises developing countries such as India, Brazil, and China.
- No binding targets for reducing GHG emissions.
- LDCs (Least Developed Countries):
- Least-developed countries.
- Exempt from binding targets.
Commitment Periods:
- Two commitment periods under the Kyoto Protocol:
- 2008 – 2012
- 2013 – 2020 (Doha Amendment to the protocol, 2012)
Kyoto Mechanisms: Joint Implementation, Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and Emissions Trading
Introduction:
The Kyoto Mechanisms, established under the Kyoto Protocol, serve as innovative tools to address climate change, promote sustainable development, and facilitate emission reduction efforts globally. This comprehensive approach comprises Joint Implementation (JI), the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and Emissions Trading.
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM):
- Purpose:
- Facilitates emission reduction projects in developing countries by Annex B Parties (countries with emission-reduction commitments).
- Projects earn Certified Emission Reduction (CER) credits, each equivalent to one tonne of CO2, contributing to Kyoto targets.
- Projects and Sustainability:
- Examples include rural electrification through solar panels or installing energy-efficient boilers.
- Trailblazing as the first global environmental investment and credit scheme.
- Flexibility:
- Provides flexibility for industrialized countries in meeting emission reduction or limitation targets.
- Standardized emissions offset instrument in the form of CERs.
Joint Implementation (JI):
- Definition:
- Allows Annex B Parties to earn Emission Reduction Units (ERUs) from emission-reduction or removal projects in other Annex B Parties.
- Promotes flexibility and cost-efficient fulfillment of Kyoto commitments.
- Eligibility and Approval:
- Projects must result in additional emissions reduction or removal.
- Requires approval from the host Party and authorization of participants by a Party involved in the project.
- Timing and Eligibility:
- Projects starting from 2000 may be eligible, but ERUs are issued for crediting periods starting after 2008.
Emissions Trading:
- Concept:
- Greenhouse gas emissions treated as a commodity.
- Allows Annex B Parties to trade emission units to meet their Kyoto targets.
- Creation of a New Commodity:
- Assigned Amount Units (AAUs) represent allowed emissions over the commitment period.
- Carbon trading established as the “carbon market.”
- Trading Units:
- Various units traded, including Removal Units (RMUs) based on land use, ERUs from Joint Implementation, and CERs from Clean Development Mechanism projects.
- Registry Systems and International Transaction Log:
- Tracks and records transfers and acquisitions of units.
- Ensures secure transfer of emission reduction units between countries.
- Commitment Period Reserve:
- Parties maintain a reserve of ERUs, CERs, AAUs, and RMUs in their national registry.
- Aimed at preventing overselling units, ensuring compliance with emissions targets.
CoP | DESCRIPTION |
Bali Summit COP13 | Introduction of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA), to engage developing countries in voluntary mitigation effort |
Copenhagen Summit COP15 |
|
Cancun Summit COP16 |
1. Technology Mechanism 2. Green Climate Fund 3. Adaptation Fund |
Durban Summit COP17 |
|
Doha Summit COP18 | Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to start second commitment period (2013-2020) |
Warsaw Summit COP19 |
1. INDC: Intended Nationally determined Contribution 2. REDD+: Reduction in Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation |
Lima Summit COP20 | COP20 Lima Summit Highlights:
Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC):
India’s INDC Targets:
|
Paris Summit COP21 | Paris Agreement on Climate Change (COP21):
Key Provisions:
20/20/20 Targets: The agreement outlines three key targets to be achieved:
USA Withdrawal:
Review Mechanism:
|
Marrakech Summit COP22 | The Marrakech Summit COP22 focused on deliberations aimed at effectively addressing the Global Stock take. During the summit, participating parties engaged in the inaugural review of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage.
Contentious Issues:
|
Bonn Summit COP23 | – |
Katowice Summit COP24 |
|
COP25 Madrid |
|
11.UN-REDD:
Overview:
- The United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD) is a significant environmental convention.
- Established in 2008, UN-REDD serves as the UN platform providing knowledge and guidance on forest-centric strategies to address climate-related challenges.
Contributing Entities:
- UN-REDD receives contributions from key organizations, including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
REDD+:
Introduction:
- REDD+ is a global warming mitigation approach developed by parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
- The primary focus of REDD+ includes forest conservation, sustainable management, and the enhancement of forest carbon reserves, complementing efforts against deforestation and forest degradation.
Warsaw Framework for REDD+ (WFR):
- The Warsaw Framework for REDD+ (WFR), accepted at COP 19 in December 2013, provides a comprehensive set of methodological and financial recommendations for the implementation of REDD+ projects.
- This framework signifies a pivotal step in the global commitment to address climate change through sustainable forest management.
Inclusion in the Paris Agreement:
- Article 5 of the Paris Agreement formally recognizes the importance of REDD+, further emphasizing its role in international efforts to combat climate change.
Conventions related to Pollutants :
Basel Convention:
Background:
- Adopted in 1989 during the Conference of Plenipotentiaries in Basel, Switzerland.
- Officially known as the “Basel Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal.”
- Came into force in 1992.
Objectives:
- International treaty with the primary goal of reducing the trans-boundary movement of hazardous waste between countries.
- Focuses on preventing the transfer of hazardous waste from developed nations to less developed countries (LDCs).
- Aims to ensure the safe disposal of hazardous waste as close as possible to its source of generation.
Key Features:
- Secretariat Location: Basel, Switzerland.
- Number of Parties: 187 (Note: Haiti and the United States have signed the Convention but not ratified it).
- The convention does not address the movement of radioactive waste.
Cooperation and Information Exchange:
- Provides a framework for cooperation among the parties involved.
- Emphasizes the exchange of information on issues relevant to the effective implementation of the Convention.
Rotterdam Convention :
- Adopted in 1998 during a Conference of Plenipotentiaries in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- Entered into force on 24th February 2004.
Coverage and Objectives:
- Addresses pesticides and industrial chemicals banned or severely restricted for health or environmental reasons.
- Inclusion in the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) procedure is based on notifications from Parties.
- Aims to promote shared responsibility and cooperative efforts among Parties in the international trade of hazardous chemicals.
- Seeks to protect human health and the environment from potential harm caused by these chemicals.
- Contributes to the environmentally sound use of hazardous chemicals by facilitating information exchange and implementing a national decision-making process on import and export.
- Legally binding obligations for the implementation of the PIC procedure are central to the Convention.
Secretariat and Parties:
- Secretariat Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- 161 parties are actively involved, with the United States among the non-member states.
Evolution from Voluntary to Legally Binding:
- The Convention builds upon the voluntary PIC procedure initiated by UNEP and the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) in 1989.
- The voluntary procedure ceased on 24th February 2006, and the Rotterdam Convention took its place with enhanced, legally binding obligations for the PIC procedure.
Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants:
Overview:
- The Stockholm Convention is a global treaty established to safeguard human health and the environment from Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs).
- Opened for signature in 2001 in Stockholm, Sweden, it came into effect in 2004.
Objectives:
- Support Transition to Safer Alternatives:
- Encourage the shift to safer alternatives for substances listed in various Annexes of the Stockholm Convention.
- Target Additional POPs for Action:
- Identify and address new Persistent Organic Pollutants through comprehensive scientific research, deliberations, and negotiations among member countries.
- Cleanup Old Stockpiles and Equipment:
- Undertake initiatives to clean up existing stockpiles and equipment containing POPs, contributing to environmental protection.
- Work Towards a POPs-Free Future:
- Collaborate globally to strive for a future free from Persistent Organic Pollutants.
Key Provisions:
- The convention calls for the prohibition of nine chemicals identified as the “dirty dozen,” which are prominent Persistent Organic Pollutants.
- It aims to restrict the use of DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) for malaria control.
- Addresses the inadvertent production of dioxins and furans, further emphasizing environmental safety.
India’s Ratification:
- India ratified the Stockholm Convention in 2006 under Article 25(4), placing itself in a default “opt-out” position.
- This position implies that amendments in various Annexes of the convention cannot be enforced on India unless an instrument of ratification/acceptance/approval or accession is explicitly deposited with the UN (United Nations) depositary.
Global Participation:
- Parties: Currently, there are 184 parties to the Convention (183 states and the European Union).
- Non-Ratifying States: Notable non-ratifying states include the United States, Israel, Malaysia, and Italy.
Financial Mechanism:
- The Global Environmental Facility (GEF) serves as the designated interim financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention, supporting its implementation on a global scale.